The Meteoric Rise of Solo Gaming in 2026
Solo Gaming in 2026: The Surprising Revolution Nobody Saw Coming
The best game you will ever play has only one player. Everything else is just waiting for your turn.
Across living rooms, kitchen tables, and dimly lit bedrooms all over the world, something is shifting in the way people play games. And the industry, for all its noise about esports and multiplayer lobbies and always-online experiences, has barely stopped to think about what it actually means.
People are choosing to play alone on purpose and In growing numbers. And they are not lonely. That distinction matters more than it seems, because for decades the assumption has been that gaming alone is what you do when nobody will play with you, a consolation prize, a fallback. The industry built itself around the opposite belief, that connection is the product and multiplayer is the destination. And yet a 2025 survey of 34,000 players across 22 countries found that 56% prefer single player games. Nobody is talking loudly enough about what this actually means.

The Princess and Her Pegs
“Ultimate outcome of a solved problem is the person who solved it.”
The story starts in 1697, in the court of a French princess.
The exact origin is disputed, but the legend holds that peg solitaire : a board game in which a single player removes pegs one by one until, ideally, only one remains was invented by a French noblewoman confined to solitary imprisonment in the Bastille. She needed something to do with her mind. She had no opponent. So she invented a game that required none.
Whether or not the story is literally true, it is mythologically perfect. Because it captures the original spirit of solo gaming with extraordinary precision: here is a mind, here is a problem, here is the pure, private pleasure of trying to solve it. No audience required. No winner’s podium. No one to impress.
From that single board with holes in it, through card solitaire, crossword puzzles, Choose Your Own Adventure gamebooks in the 1980s, through Ambush! in 1983, through the digital revolution and eventually through a global pandemic, the thread runs unbroken. Solo gaming didn’t emerge from loneliness. It was born from something older and quieter: the human need to be alone with a challenge.
What Solo Gaming Actually Gives You
Multiplayer gaming gives you other people. Solo gaming gives you yourself. That sounds obvious but it is not, because what it means in practice is that the two experiences are not competing for the same thing at all.
When you sit down to a multiplayer game the primary variable is other humans. Their decisions, their mistakes, their cooperation, their hostility. The game is a medium for human interaction. Remove the other people and there is nothing left.

But a solo game is structured around a completely different relationship:
-
The opponent is the system
-
The tension is internal
-
The victory, when it comes, belongs entirely to you
-
And so, crucially, does the failure
Think of it like the difference between a conversation and a meditation. Both involve attention but one is about exchange and one is about depth. Solo gaming is a form of structured self-encounter, a designed space where you face your own decision-making, your own patience, your own willingness to keep going against a problem that was built to resist you.
A Pattern in Solo Gaming Older Than Any Game
The shape of this has shown up across history in ways that are easy to miss because they do not look like gaming on the surface.
In medieval monasteries, monks practised sacred reading not in groups but alone in silence with a text that demanded their full attention. The goal was not information but transformation, and the difficulty was the point. In the twentieth century crossword puzzles became the first mass market solo activity in the modern sense, printed in newspapers, solved at kitchen tables, entirely private in their satisfactions. Nobody called crossword enthusiasts antisocial. The assumption was simply that some people, sometimes, want the clean pleasure of a problem and a solution with no intermediary.
And then came the 1980s when Choose Your Own Adventure books gave children their first taste of a story where their choices had consequences, where they were not readers but protagonists. Millions of children who grew up making those paper choices became the adults who now sink forty hours into Baldur’s Gate 3 alone or spend a Sunday afternoon with a board game designed specifically for one.
Each era found its own form but the mechanism was always the same: one mind, one system, the private pleasure of real engagement.
How the Pandemic Changed Solo Gaming Forever
It would be tempting to date the rise of solo gaming to 2020 and the lockdowns and the cancelled tabletop nights and the enforced solitude that drove millions of people back to games they had been meaning to play for years. But the pandemic was an accelerant, not the origin. The trend was already building well before anyone had heard of COVID.
Consider the games that were already quietly proving this:
-
Mage Knight (2011) — widely considered one of the first genuinely great solo board games, a complex and deeply satisfying puzzle of movement and strategy
-
Spirit Island — designed for groups but equally compelling alone
-
Terraforming Mars — built for multiplayer, discovered by solo players
-
Viticulture — a social game with a solo mode that developed its own following
The community and the hunger existed. The pandemic simply made it visible to everyone else.
And something unexpected happened when it did. People who played alone during the lockdowns did not stop when the world opened back up. The 56% preference number from 2025 is not a pandemic hangover. It is a settled preference. What the lockdowns did was give people permission to discover what they actually wanted, and a significant portion of them found that what they wanted was a particular kind of quiet, focused, self-directed experience that multiplayer games for all their brilliance simply cannot provide.
Why Solo Gaming Makes Sense Right Now
“Just as you travel so that you can miss your home, you socialize so that you can miss yourself.” — Naval Ravikant
Zoom out far enough and the pattern becomes clear. Solo gaming is rising at exactly the same moment that the loneliness epidemic is dominating headlines, that social media has made us more connected and more performatively social than any generation in history, and that the average person’s attention is pulled across a dozen platforms and group chats before 9am.
A 2024 survey found that 56% of Americans view solitude as crucial for their mental health. Research increasingly separates loneliness, the painful experience of unwanted isolation, from positive solitude, the chosen and restorative experience of being alone with intention. Solo gaming sits squarely in the second category. It is structured solitude. It gives the mind something to hold while it recovers from the relentless sociality of modern life.
We live in an age that has turned human interaction into performance, likes and followers and public wins and viral moments, and in response a growing number of people are choosing experiences that are genuinely unobserved. You cannot go viral playing a solo journaling game at your kitchen table. There is no leaderboard. There is no audience. There is only you, a set of dice, and a story that exists entirely inside your own notebook. That is not a lesser experience. It might be the most honest one left.
Solo Gaming at Kheo Games: What We Learned
We have solo modes in two of our games, Go Goa and Panchayat, and Panchayat is the more interesting story because it surprised even us.
Panchayat started as a multiplayer game where players take on roles of sarpanches from competing villages, building influence and outmaneuvering each other across the table. It is social at its core and works beautifully that way. But our designers entered it into a solo game design contest as an experiment and it performed well enough that we committed to building something genuinely new around it rather than just stripping the multiplayer version down.
What struck us most is that nobody told these players to do this. A game designed for multiplayer developed a genuine solo following entirely through player behaviour, which is about as clear a market signal as you can get. When players adapt your game in a direction you did not fully anticipate, the right response is to follow them there and build it properly.
What Solo Gaming Is Really About
Solo gaming, whether analog or digital, has always been about the same thing. The relationship between a mind and a system designed to challenge it, with no intermediary, no audience, and no external validation required. It began in a prison cell and grew through monasteries and puzzle books and pandemic lockdowns into something that many of the world’s players now prefer.
It rose not because people stopped wanting connection but because the world oversupplied performance and undersupplied depth. It rose because there is a specific hunger, ancient and apparently very widespread, for an experience that is entirely yours:
-
One that asks something of you
-
One that you can fail at quietly and try again
-
One that does not need to be witnessed to be real
The industry sees it as a market preference. Psychologists see it as positive solitude. Historians see it as a tradition stretching back centuries. But the most honest way to put it is probably this: when you sit down to play alone, you are doing something that people across thousands of years have found to be quietly necessary. You are spending time with the one opponent who will always show up, will always be honest with you, and will always make the game genuinely interesting.
Yourself.
